Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

As Sarah Palin's Family Life Becomes Public, Will She Stay on the GOP Ticket?

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted September 1, 2008.


In 1972, Tom Eagleton was the Democratic VP nominee for 18 days when another private drama became public.
Advertisement

The questions surrounding the family life of the putative Republican vice presidential nominee, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, are deepening and not going to go away, despite efforts by Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain to move on to other issues.

In the past 36 hours, a Daily Kos blogger assembled photographs and other documentation alleging that Palin was the grandmother, not the mother of five-month-old Trig Palin, the infant she has said is her fifth child. The Kos reports said that Palin has been "lying" for months about the infant's parentage, in order to protect the child's real mother, her 17-year-old daughter.

Then on Monday, in response to a Reuters report about those allegations, the McCain campaign released a statement from Sarah and Todd Palin that said their 17-year-old daughter was now pregnant, and would carry the baby and soon marry the father. The campaign's response implies that Palin's daughter could not be the five-month-old infant's mother because of her current pregnancy.

"Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family," the Palins' statement said. "We ask the media to respect our daughter and Levi's privacy as has always been the tradition of children of candidates."

Asked Monday, Obama said the Palin pregnancy should be "off limits."

"Let me be as clear as possible... I think people's families are off limits and people's children are especially off limits," he said while campaigning in Michigan, adding his mother was 18 years old when she gave birth. "It has no relevance to Governor Palin's performance as governor or her potential performance as vice president."

There is little chance the media will respect the Palin family's privacy, not when there are legitimate larger questions about what the surprise choice of Palin as McCain's running mate reveals about the GOP presidential candidate's judgment and temperament. The facts surrounding the Palin family's pregnancies may not become known, but they do suggest the Alaska governor will at the very least have many distractions while she is campaigning this fall, to say nothing of her fitness to become commander-in-chief.

Whether Palin will remain on the 2008 GOP ticket is not a matter of idle speculation. Recent presidential campaigns have seen candidacies abruptly end after candidates are caught lying or are burdened by the disclosure of personal issues that question their ability to lead.

Just 20 years ago, the Democrats' vice presidential nominee, Sen. Joe Biden (D-Deleware) saw his own presidential bid implode after he plagiarized British politician Neil Kinnock. Even this weekend, that ghost resurfaced as Obama and Biden were jointly interviewed on CBS News 60 Minutes. Ironically, as the Palin story was unfolding, ABC Reporter Steve Kroft reminded Biden of the plagarism episode and noted today's GOP was planning a campaign ad about it.

"I made a mistake 20, 21, 22 years ago," Biden told ABC. "I was arrogant. I didn't think I had to prepare. I showed up at the debate and I failed to quote somebody. A guy named Neil Kinnock. And I just ask people and everyone else, look at the last 20 years of my career since that allegation occurred."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: pregnancy, mccain, daily kos, sarah palin, palin, trig palin, bristol palin

Steven Rosenfeld is a Senior Fellow at AlterNet.org, where he reports on elections from a voting rights perspective. His books include Count My Vote: A Citizen's Guide to Voting (AlterNet Books, 2008), What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election (The New Press, 2006), and Making History in Vermont: The Election of a Socialist to Congress (Hollowbrook Publishing, 1992). An award-winning journalist, he has been a staff reporter at National Public Radio, Monitor Radio, TomPaine.com, and at daily and weekly newspapers in Vermont.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
527
Posted by: Jeanne on Sep 1, 2008 3:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin was part of a 527 fundraising entity for Alaska Senator Ted Stevens. Huffingtonpost.com has the article sourced from an Alaska newspaper. This, to me, is far more troubling than the fact that Palin's 17-yr old daughter is pregnant. Although, that story begs the question of Palin's opinion on sex education and birth control.

Palin's personal life could be an issue, but the bigger issue is her fundamentalist Christian ideology, that will bleed into any decision-making or policy-making that she might be allowed to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 527 Posted by: VZEQICVA
sex can save your soul?
Posted by: edgar1 on Sep 1, 2008 3:05 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wow, those christian chicks are hot!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sex can save your soul? Posted by: leTerrassier
» RE: sex can save your soul? Posted by: LionHeart
» RE: sex can save your soul? Posted by: Quannah
» RE: sex can save your soul? Posted by: paula.c
» RE: sex can save your soul? Posted by: john mont
WASHINGTON DC IS NOT A SMALLTOWN IN ALASKA
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 1, 2008 3:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Realistically I'm don't know how she can survive. She a big fish in a little bowl and seems to get her way with her looks and or temper.She's not ready for the big time. A pregnant daughter is the least of it. She may not be stupid by she sure is naive. She's probably never even been on a crowded train or bus. Is she really ready to sign on for 4 years 24/7 ? I don't think so. I'm personally not willing to pay the price to find out. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AIP
Posted by: MarkInOhio on Sep 1, 2008 3:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even worse than the 527 connection is Palin's active involvement (pre-mayor, in the sportscaster-and-beauty-queen days) with the Alaska Independence Party, which advocates secession from the US. Remember when South Carolina wanted to secede?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: AIP Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Big plus? Posted by: Evelyn
Eagleton was a lot cleaner than Palin.
Posted by: jwverez on Sep 1, 2008 3:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd love to see Palin lose her VP status for giving motherhood a bad rap !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are family values off limits too?
Posted by: crashgrab on Sep 1, 2008 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama says Palin's daughter's pregnancy "has no relevance to Governor Palin's performance as governor or her potential performance as vice president." But what about the millions of Republicans who have been making family values an issue for the last few decades. I guess all the other family values issues are off the table too then.

This is ridiculous. I sure hope those self-righteous religious conservatives don't vote for this woman. But what would self-righteousness be without hypocrisy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Palin's views ARE on topic Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: Palin's views ARE on topic Posted by: crashgrab
» Use it, abuse it, I hate politics Posted by: Elmowilcox
Perhaps Now
Posted by: JSquercia on Sep 1, 2008 3:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps now she will realize that Abstinence Education does not work for most people . There is a reason for Birth Control and it is useful in preventing abortions .Sadly the Relegious crazies also Oppose IT .
The idea that two high school students should marry just because the created a child is wrong . They are unshaped Human Beings . God knows there are thousands of couples who would love to adopt the baby and who would be MATURE and LOVING Parents

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perhaps Now Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Perhaps Now Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: Perhaps Now Posted by: luzmejor
Gov. Palin still can't pass the smell test
Posted by: PaulK on Sep 1, 2008 4:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Question: how does a 43 year old get pregnant?

Answer: oh, a little wine, a little soft music...

Question: Did Governor Palin try to get pregnant while Governor? Isn't that a job and a half?

Question: what was the baby's birthday? This was curious all the time I was reading up on the issue.

Question: How does Gov. Palin stay so incredibly slim at her age? What's her secret? Did she work out at the gym like crazy for 4 months? The average new mom would still be as fat as, -- as fat as Bristol is.

New Question: so, did hockey mom ever wear a pillow on her stomach? Was she into deceit for her own evangelical-fueled career?

New Question: Is McCain such a stooge? Did Gidget pull the wool over geezer's eyes? Twice?

Final Questions: Is this one going back to Alaska? When? So, does Joe Lieberman look all that bad now? (yes he does, but whatever.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems stand to lose if they attack Palin
Posted by: ericdondero on Sep 1, 2008 4:29 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin is a libertarian Republican. Libertarians absolutely adore her.

In 2006, the Democrats made an extreme effort to win over Libertarian support. Markos Moulitas, TNR and other top Lefties, posted article after article about how the Donkey Party was the best home for wayward libertarians unhappy with the GOP.

Now, here we are two years later, and those same sources are attacking one of the most respected libertarian Governors in the Nation.

Kiss the libertarian swing vote Goodbye Democrats. You all just screwed up royally. We Libertarians have taken notice of your savage attacks on our gal Sarah Palin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Libertarian? You've got to be kidding! Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian
Hypocrisy
Posted by: realguy on Sep 1, 2008 4:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder what republican reaction would have been, if during the 1996 presidential election the Clintons announced that Chelsea were pregnant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hypocrisy Posted by: mgmyers79
» RE: Hypocrisy Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Hypocrisy GOOD CALL! Posted by: VZEQICVA
McCain's sop to the religious wing-nuts; Harriet Meirs Mk II?
Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian on Sep 1, 2008 4:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did you know it's a mortal sin to use a condom during pre-marital sex? (sarcasm, folks)

The Repuglicans simply delight in cynically turning identity politics on its head; remember Clarance Thomas, Harriet Meirs? Clearly NOT QUALIFIED, but used as sops to certain "constituencies" like a cruel joke and look what we're stuck with now?

McCain really wanted Lieberman, and may still get him; Palin may just be his sop of the religious right-wing-nuts in his party. Once she implodes it'll free McSenile to choose whomever he wants (in the face of a "political emergency") hoping that the wing-nutters will vote for him because he at least tried to molify them with Palin.

As far as the whole who-is/was-or-wasn't-pregnant storyline is concerned, while it represents a disturbing glimpse of Palin's hypocrisy and all-too-quick willingness to lie for personal and political gain, we should probably find another angle of attack (which ought not be too hard to find). Troopergate sounds promising (and can't be dismissed as the so-called "liberal media up to it's old tricks" especially now that Palin has hired an attorney); her abuse of power and incompetence in office, her dangerously radical stands on social issues, her total lack of national experience (GOP talking point now is that she has "more executive experience than Obama and Biden combined") and her utter ignorance of anything beyond small-town Alaska; it's quite the smorgasbord!

I'm hoping for some really good gaffes from Palin; shouldn't take more than a couple to sink the whole boat!

(If the Repugs want to bring up plagiarism; Biden should point out McNutWing's recent forrays into "copying from others" as well; Wikipedia article on Georgia/Solzhenitzin's Christmas in prison story).

GO OBAMA/BIDEN!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mommy Dearest?
Posted by: adingoatemybaby on Sep 1, 2008 5:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me get this straight...she's sending her eldest into the firing line, she's 'proud' that her knocked-up teenage daughter is marrying before she earns a high school diploma, and has abandoned her developmentally disabled infant for a White House run.... What ARE her priorities??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mommy Dearest? Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Mommy Dearest? Posted by: VZEQICVA
Conservatism does not apply to real people
Posted by: cbmtrx on Sep 1, 2008 5:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't laughed this hard since the dinner scene from "The Nutty Professor".

Ms Palin, if your own daughter doesn't abide by your Republican principles about the woes of pre-marital sex and the wisdom of abstinence-only, then why on earth would anyone else?

Your political convictions are, quite obviously, an utter farce.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mis - information
Posted by: LionHeart on Sep 1, 2008 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, talking about spreading rumors. Palin's daughter is pregnant and Palin is a grandmother to be!

Kids will do it to you every time!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fighting a losing battle
Posted by: boing007 on Sep 1, 2008 5:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hormones. Abstinence only or Sex education can't fight Mother Nature. They sneak up on you and are difficult to control.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth and rumors
Posted by: akbirdwm on Sep 1, 2008 5:45 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Up in here in Alaska, we've been pretty surprised by the rumor that the Palin's new baby is actually her daughter's since it was reported that the baby has Down's Syndrome. That's not very likely to happen to a teenager. Also, there was a bit of a huff with Alaska Airlines when the Gov left Texas while in labor so Trigg could be born in AK. Not that doesn't mean that Sarah isn't person capable of talking out of one side of her mouth, which I'm sure the Nation will get to see soon enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A comment from another Palin thread worth repeating
Posted by: Obama2008Fan on Sep 1, 2008 5:57 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before Hillary's bitter PUMA crowd votes Republican in November, they should consider the following Palin laundry list that was posted today of a popular anti-McCain website.

She was elected Alaska's governor a little over a year and a half ago. Her previous office was mayor of Wasilla, a small town outside Anchorage.

Palin faces accusations of firing public safety commissioner Walt Monegan in what amounts to a messy Palin family drama dating to her pre-gubernatorial days. Monegan had refused to fire a state trooper who'd gone through a messy divorce from Palin's sister.

The governor has no foreign policy experience.

She is strongly anti-choice, opposing abortion even in the case of rape or incest.

She supported ultraconservative Pat Buchanan for president in 2000.

Palin thinks creationism (intelligent design) should be taught in public schools.

She's doesn't believe human beings are a major cause of climate change.

Palin is solidly in line with John McCain's "Big Oil first" energy policy.

She has pushed hard for more oil drilling and says renewables won't be ready for years.

Palin sued the Bush administration for listing polar bears as an endangered species (she was worried they would interfere with more oil drilling in Alaska).


So how closely did John McCain vet his choice? He met Sarah Palin once at a meeting last year. They spoke a second time one week before the GOP convention, when he called her about being vice president. McCain then offered her the position.

On September 1, the press reported that her unmarried teenage daughter was pregnant, a condition McCain claimed he knew about before making Palin his VP pick. So much for Republican family values -- like not having premarital sex.

Obama Fan
Obama 4 President 2008

PS: Never forget what a "Maverick" is -- a grumpy old man who enjoys pissing people off, both Democrats and Republicans!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hugh Scott - the "war hero" Posted by: LionHeart
» RE: Hugh Scott - the "war hero" Posted by: crashgrab
donnal
Posted by: donnal on Sep 1, 2008 6:04 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your piece is a what this country is all about...gotcha.

Even for Obama supporters this is a new low. Let's go even lower, and talk about Joe Biden and his son Beau the AG, who had Obama's lover taken into custody in DL to hide the truth.

Gotcha.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: donnal Posted by: LionHeart
» RE: donnal Posted by: emmas
» RE: donnal Posted by: Quannah
ANSWER: NO SHE WON'T
Posted by: rancespergl on Sep 1, 2008 6:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUH-BYE SARAH! DON'T LET THE DOOR CATCH YOU...

NEXT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ANSWER: NO SHE WON'T Posted by: nochicagoboys
White Hunter, Black Heart
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 1, 2008 6:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first half of that sentence describes Sarah Palin. If you've seen that film you know the second half not only does not, but also that she may be one of the ugliest, nastiest cows in politics. (Wow, you remember Eagleton? What year did you hand crank your first Babbage Engine?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In politics...
Posted by: WhuThe?!? on Sep 1, 2008 6:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In politics, the truth always comes out"

Since when?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah's Christian ideology will be her undoing
Posted by: Jasonix on Sep 1, 2008 7:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many religious right voters will not be enthused enough by Sarah Palin to vote for McCain for the simple reason that she's a woman, and such conservative types have a hard time with women in authority. Now that it's clear that she hasn't even managed to raise her own daughter well, by her own standards, this will disqualify her for leadership. The political machine will try to paint her daughter's failure as a triumph for the pro-life cause, but it will fail.

The issue that progressives should focus on regarding Palin is whether she follows the religious right's belief that women should submit to their husbands - and what this might mean for a potential Palin presidency. If John McCain dies, will the real leader of the country be an Alaskan redneck oil rig worker? Will President Palin be forced to reconsider her position on drilling, foreign policy, or alternative energy because her husband tells her to? How can President Palin keep her private life as a submissive wife separate from her public calling as leader of the free world? There is no way that President Palin - or even Vice President Palin - could "put her family" first, which is supposed to be her religious duty. That being the case, how can we elect a potential president who will be torn between what she believes her religious duty to be, and what her position demands of her?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reaping what you Sow
Posted by: Brian_L on Sep 1, 2008 7:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The teenage pregnancy of Palin's daughter is another fine example how neo-cons reap what they sow:

1) Abstinence only sex-ed advocate's daughter gets pregnant,
2) Anti-gay VP has a gay daughter,
3) Preacher prays for rain during DNC convention, gets a hurricane to disrupt his,
4) anti-gay politicians (and presidents) always get colon cancer or are at risk and need to get screened regularly.

OF COURSE, the GOP is spinning it into a anti-choice statment. That's when we say "I'm glad she had that choice. You know, it's not up to the government to tell us how many children we should have."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Palin being unjustly pummeled
Posted by: 220vBrain on Sep 1, 2008 8:03 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boy oh Boy, how everyone wants to drag Sarah Palin and her family through the briar bushes and then the pigs wallow. I highly doubt that this woman would risk it all, by claiming a child to be hers that wasn't; (DNA can tell the truth) or that it was her daughters birthed by her husband..she'd divorce him, and have him jailed. Palin isn't STUPID! She is the mother of all her children,including Trig! It is common for a woman in her forties to have a Downs Syndrome baby. I would imagine that she wasn't using birth control even at forty. The dirty filthy lies and enuendos now flying all over the web about her show how jaded and base people have become. It shows to what lowbrow depths they will sink to besmirch and sully someones career,marriage,parenting skills and honor, because the rumor mongers teeth are dripping with venomous droul...and they cannot wait to sink their teeth into Palin!

What goes around comes around, and I hope all of you that continue to feed the viper of lies, gets bit!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sarah Palin being unjustly pummeled Posted by: dangerouslysane
» Can't wait for the DNA! Posted by: countingdaisies
» Palin put herself in this position Posted by: itzamirakul
Liam on the Left
Posted by: Liam on Sep 1, 2008 8:13 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kind of jackass votes for these hypocrites? The time has come to give serious consideration to getting rid of the southern states and most of the mid-west. They all suck tax dollars from the "blue" states while we pay to keep their backward cultures and economies alive. Cut them loose and let them die.

Alaska couldn't survive without the tax dollars of us "tax and spend" liberals - let them try and good riddance to them! Ignorant jerks destroying our country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bristol Pregnant? Todd DUI?
Posted by: myfriendcharles on Sep 1, 2008 8:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is way out of control! Dick Chaney only got two DUI's George Bush only got one DUI, and they say that when Lora Bush killed her boyfriend in a car accident that she was stone cold sober. The Palin family full of wife beating (Palin brother-in-law), drunk driving (Palin husband), pregnant teen (Palin daughter), Obama voting (palin mother in-law), white trash beauty Queen (Palin herself), represents a true slice of America and will appeal to the conservative base. When I saw her on MTV saying, I should vote for Ron Paul I knew that she was the one for me. The racist pro-war Christians would want this mama serving some nice moose stew on White House table. As a corruption fighter she will reopen the case on the Silverado Savings and loan scandal as well as go after the Keating Five.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bristol Pregnant? Todd DUI? Posted by: yellowman
» Palin:Racist at heart? Posted by: itzamirakul
Kossacks want us back to the issues, please
Posted by: fbc21ca on Sep 1, 2008 8:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't go saying Daily Kos spread this story -- some semi-anoymous fly-by blogger on Kos did. BIG difference. The Kossack response from the REAL community there has been uniformly denouncing this entire story line.

Simple reason: It's irrelevant, demeaning and stinks of a Rovian double-cross a la Dan Rather.

Plus - we just don't care!

What we DO care about is her POSITIONS ON THE ISSUES.

THAT is what should be the focus. And that's plenty to get her & Grampa defeated, frankly...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Personal decisions reflect political decisions