Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Our economy didn't melt down, it was taken down the unbridled greed of economic elites, enabled by their political courtesans in Washington.

100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Five Most Wanted Rip-off Artists from Wall Street and Washington

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted November 3, 2008.


Our economy didn't melt down, it was taken down the unbridled greed of economic elites, enabled by their political courtesans in Washington.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

Atrocities in Gaza: Piecing Together the Story
Liliana Segura, AlterNet

Unprecedented Numbers of Americans Question Israel's Actions in Gaza
Max Blumenthal, Huffington Post

The End of the Financial World as We Know It
Michael Lewis, David Einhorn, The New York Times

Big Booty Beauty and the New Sexual Aesthetic
Myra Mendible, American Sexuality Magazine

Should the First Lady Get a Paycheck?
Sheila Gibbons, Women's eNews

Why Colleges Are Just Not That into You
Zac Bissonette, The Daily Beast

Why Belief Isn't That Different for Atheists or Religious People
Larry Beinhart, AlterNet

More stories by Jim Hightower

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

What the hell's happening here? Why is my bank in the tank? And my house and job? And my retirement money? Even my state's teetering on the brink of broke! Who did this to us?

Fair questions, but we're not getting honest answers. Last year, at the first signs of the global financial slide toward the abyss, we were told that it's just a little hiccup caused by something called subprime mortgages. Not to worry, the Powers That Be declared confidently, for we have the damage contained. And rest assured that "the fundamentals of our economy are sound."

Then, this spring, Bear Stearns cratered, requiring an emergency federal subsidy to cover billions in bad loans. Okay, admitted those in charge, that subprime stuff actually is leveraged on up the financial system, and maybe there's been a bit of greed among a few of the big players, but we really do have the problem contained now, and, hey, "the fundamentals of our economy are sound."

But in September--Omigosh!--there went Lehman Brothers, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, AIG, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, WaMu, Wachovia, and others. Well, yes, conceded the now-frazzled financial establishment, but gollies, we're throwing hundreds of billions of your tax dollars into sandbags to contain the problem, and remember: "The fundamentals of our economy are sound."

In October, the contagion rolled through Britain, Canada, and Europe; it spread to Brazil and across to China and Japan; and--Holy Schmoly--suddenly all of Iceland was melting in bankruptcy! Stay calm, cried an openly panicked chorus of Washington officials, for we're holding some big summit meetings soon and consulting our Ouija boards, and...uh...ah...um...y'all just keep clinging to the thought that "the fundamentals of our economy are sound."

Laissez Fairies

You don't have to be in Who's Who to know What's What, do you? The fundamentals are NOT sound.

Wall Street and Washington (excuse the redundancy there) want us commoners to believe that this viral spread of economic grief was caused by those lower-income homeowners who couldn't pay their subprime loans--merely an unforeseeable glitch in a complex and otherwise healthy financial system. Hogwash. The source of today's pain is the same as it was in America's previous financial collapses: the unbridled greed of economic elites, enabled by their political courtesans in Washington.

This unbridling has been the long-sought goal of a cabal of deregulation ideologues who dwell in laissez-fairyland. During the past two decades, they have relentlessly pushed their economic fantasies into law. Their theory was that (to use Ronald Reagan's simple construct) "the magic of the marketplace" would create an eternal rainbow of prosperity through financial "innovation"--if only the market was unshackled from any pesky public regulations. What the dereg theorists missed, however, is that magicians don't perform magic. They perform illusions.

Let's meet some of the illusionists who are directly responsible for hurling you, me, America, and most of the world into this dark and as-yet unplumbed economic hole.

Phil Gramm

Snide, sour, and sanctimonious, this former senator from Texas is now head lobbyist for the Swiss-based banking giant, UBS, as well as chief economic adviser for his old chum John McCain. A bathed-in-the-blood, footwashing, free-market absolutist, Gramm advocates a virulent brand of antigovernment, market-knows-best, Rambo capitalism.

In 1999, as chair of the Senate Banking Committee, he had the power to implement some of his cockamamie dogmas. First, he pushed through a bill to dissolve the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act, a New Deal reform that prohibited banks, investment houses, and insurance companies from combining into one corporation. By keeping these components of our financial system separate, Glass-Steagall made sure that the crash of one of them would not bring down the other two. But a number of Wall Street banks, led by what would become Citigroup, saw a profit windfall for themselves if only they could scuttle the old law and merge banking, investment, and insurance into huge financial conglomerates. The senator was their ideological soul mate, and he was delighted to rig the system for them.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, wall street, alan greenspan, bailout, phil gramm, henry paulson, financial crisis, chris cox, william donaldson

From "The Hightower Lowdown," edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer, November 2008. Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker and author of the book Swim Against the Current: Even a Dead Fish Can Go With the Flow. (Wiley, March 2008)

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The public knows they are being scammed.
Posted by: Artkansas on Nov 3, 2008 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The magic of the market is less popular than before and while I have a Libertarian friend who still believes in non-regulation, even he agrees that there should have been no bail out. He is miffed that the rules were changed at a very convenient time.

I wrote my representatives before the vote on the Bailout/Payoff, urging them to say no and study the matter in depth and take Roosevelt's policy as a model.

They ignored me and rolled over like puppies. This bill was a travesty. A gravy train for the guilty.

I'm certainly voting against the incumbents in this election. Not that I think it will help much. Too many people are still in the Democrat/Republican are the only alternatives mindset. Politics are corrupt!

We know we are being scammed, but being able to fight it is something else. Our representatives represent the big businesses, not their constituients.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "Free" market
Posted by: drfun on Nov 3, 2008 2:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the fascist's "Goon's & Thug's" of the Bu$h cabal and their accomplices in Congress McCain,Biden and Obama included are "Enemy Combatant's" of the USA voting for this unpatriotic bill, with all deserving life sentences at Gitmo enduring what "Enemy Combatant's" have.

I know Obama "Zombies" will be falsely accusing me of being a "Racist" while the pontificate from their non-minority neighborhoods, go figure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The "Free" market Posted by: mwhitley5562
» RE: The "Free" market Posted by: Von
Out the Co-Conspirators, Too
Posted by: Dr. J on Nov 3, 2008 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While your article names the individuals, particularly Gramm and Greenspan, who created the foundation for this economic house of cards, there were, and are, many on both sides of the aisle, who conspired to create the chimera of solvency and sound policy.

Look at Biden and the Credit Card Industry, as well as Schummer and the Hedge Fund Managers, etc. It would be helpful if we had a listing that correlates all the large corporations, from oil to military, from pharma to financials, alongside their enablers in congress, the executive branch and, last but not least, the federal judiciary. Then we can truly assess who are the co-conspirators in this debacle. They too need to be outed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Out the Co-Conspirators, Too Posted by: petusthefetus
It's called FASCISM
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Nov 3, 2008 3:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it stars a place where “capitalism” and "democracy" cannot & DOES NOT EXIST outside of Orwellian BS slogans to betray gullible Americans into betraying themselves.

There's the real fairytale: Fascism sold as killing joke "democracy" by the usual Organized Corporate Crime Rule .

Fascists and Fascism has brought on the liar-fest of blood money genocide 9/11 "war on terror" into martial law blackmail Wall Street "bailout". All of it supported 100% by McCain and Obama in the pocket of their criminal paymasters to be sold straight down the line in the name of (what else) but "freedom" and "democracy".

Would you like a little denial with that folks? A little cognitive dissonance perhaps?

Meanwhile we've got the Alternets of the world recycling most of the Washington-MSM circus lies that McCain and Obama have pumped out wholesale every day on the campaign trail.

By now the only people that actually tell anything like the truth are marginalized, demoted, fired, or just plain told to shut up and go away, lest they rain on the sordid parade.

As George Carlin said: "If you have selfish ignorant citizens you're going to get selfish ignorant leaders...The public sucks. F**k Hope...Forget the politicians. They’re irrelevant. The politicians are put there to give you the idea you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice.

You have OWNERS. They OWN YOU. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying to get what they want. Well we know what they want: they want more for themselves and less for everybody else.”


Welcome to Amerika -- land of slaves, home of fool cowards.

God help us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's called FASCISM Posted by: richholland
» RE: It's called FASCISM Posted by: mwhitley5562
» My sentiments exactly Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: The egomaniacs rule! Posted by: Cybershaman
Greenspan should feel the shame of his inaction
Posted by: cognitorex on Nov 3, 2008 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Circa 1986 I sat high up over the New York City financial area with a prominent bank's Executive VP and Director.
He said, "Where do you think we should be looking for future profits, we'd like to have of our equity 'at play.'
I was flattered that he should court my opinion. I also remember thinking, "Half your equity at play, what are you, nuts?"
The bank is no more in existence.
The thinking that taking increasing risk in order to increase bonuses brought the system down. Paying people to book trades and make risky loans without waiting for repayment or profits to be realized created a bonus atmosphere versus a profit atmosphere.
Greenspan absolutely had to fully know of these issues.
For personal or political reasons he let the GOP/big bank's horsepucky 'no regulation' mantra rule global financial markets to the gross neglect of the world's individual depositors and pension holders, both average folks and the very wealthy.
His legacy from his time at the helm is cowardice and abject failure. I hope he can feel shame; lots of it, unregulated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Counting your chickens... Posted by: Cybershaman
more wanted posters
Posted by: cynthe on Nov 3, 2008 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i agree about the wanted posters, but you should also add all senators and representatives who supported deregulation. Just because a bill is proposed, doesn't mean our representatives have to support it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Bob and Larry on Jim's list?
Posted by: Teller on Nov 3, 2008 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not Rubin? Not Summers? Not...
Hightower again playing pick up the soap in the Democratic Party showers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can Someone Actually Explain to Me...
Posted by: Russianrocket on Nov 3, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How derivatives caused the current crisis. I keep hearing the same quote from Buffer over and over again, about financial weapons of mass destruction, but no one has yet to explain to me how derivatives are responsible for the crisis. For that matter, no article on this site has actaully given a good explanation of what a derivative actually is.

Can someone please give me a detailed explanation of how derivatives are responsible for this and not something like, say interest rates being too low for too long (A legitimate criticism of Greenspan) or are current accound deficit?

Thank You

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Can Someone Actually Explain to Me... Posted by: manufactured_consent
» Some problems with that story Posted by: Russianrocket
» And you're lying through your teeth Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Complete rubbish!! Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Some problems with that story Posted by: Russianrocket
» RE: Some problems with that story Posted by: Russianrocket
» How about this Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: How about this Posted by: popeurbanxxiii
» Good analysis here: Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
Trickle Down is the Feudal System- TREASON
Posted by: Purple Girl on Nov 3, 2008 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having considered myself a avid 'Clintonian' during the '90's ...Hindsight ( Hillary's Inactions in the senate and her dispictable campaign)Have smacked the Rose Colored Glasses Off my face. Granted I was far more liberal than the Clintons (and am still more liberal than sen Obama) but after 12 yrs of Trickle down and social shackling I was willing to compromise any way possible to change the tide. Well it appeared to have been shifted a bit...Until this meltdown. The Clinton's pushed everything Forward..Not 'Pay it forward', But 'Play it forward'..No wonder we had so much extra cash on hand after he left office..They Paid for Nothing!
this is why I am Revolted everytime I hear the Lastest Cheney Puppets bitch about possilbe tax increases. Frankly the Rich should be kicking down...Since it was OUR money they stole anyway. Neither should any of US bitch since it is Our Duty to try to rectify this Fuck Up before the Next genereation must be placed upon th eGlobal Auction block Too.
We must have as much fortitude and committment to them as our Grandparents showed during the First Great depression.
Paying taxes is not just 'Patriotic' it is our Duty to our Children and their Children. Funny a MOTHER of 5 has no concept of Duty to her own children...That alone tells me enough about where Sarah Palins priorities lie.Sacrific? Our Country Was Built on Sacrific.Just as in Merry Ol' England which many of Our ancestors Fled, Trickle Dwon is the Economy of Kings.
The last 30 yrs have been controlled by Monarchy Loyalist -not to English Rule, but in Hopes of Building their Own here.Seems many in the Republican party dusted off their Red Coats and Crowns. Waht is the difference if it's a Family Crest or a Corp Logo is the Rich control all the wealth created by the other Classes? ABsolutely NOTHING!
The name it self implies it's goal- to Retain Wealth and only dispense to those Below in samll increments. It might as well been called 'PAY UP'.
But this has not been their only means be resurrect the systems ourancestors fled and bleed to defeat...Consider the Religious right and their Judgement on all others...they would like US to bow to their 'Holy' Order too.
How dare these people call themselves the 'True Americans' when both doctrines are explicitly UNAmerican!
Our only possible escape is the Vote and what are they doing..Lying to the voters about eligibility, Intimidating others, blocking participation and very likely stealing votes when ever possible.
These Are High Crimes and should be Prosecuted as Such, To the Fullest extent of the Law. It is time we take a page out of our Friends the French's History Book...Viva la America..Off with their Heads!
Economic, Social and religious Oppression has NO place in Our Free Market Democracy and We Must make it VERY Clear it will not be tolerated Anymore!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rather short list
Posted by: al.hamilton on Nov 3, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Odd that the infamous George Soros is not included in Mr. Hightower's analysis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He is . . . Posted by: dustdevil
Sub prime frenzy
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Nov 3, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it goes back to the sub prime frenzy! Greed, the almighty dollar. the loan brokers getting their commission, the real estate broker getting their commission, greed, greed and more greed. nevermind the borrowers ability to actually repay the loan, just give me my commission.

JIff
Is your ISP watching you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sub prime frenzy Posted by: Lauren
» RE: derivatives Posted by: Lauren
Why isn't Bill Clinton on the list?
Posted by: sausage on Nov 3, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Y'know Abraham Lincoln was wrong: "You can fool all of the people all of the time," and Bill Clinton is living proof of that. He fooled 250,000,000 Americans into thinking he is a "liberal" Democrat! And he still has Rush-Limbaugh-listeners and Ted Nugent-fans fooled!

Richard Nixon wasn't crazy enough undo the New Deal. And even Ronald "Government is the problem" Reagan wasn't crazy enough to go full bore with the anti-New Deal deregulation of the financial industry that we saw during the Clinton years. Yet Bill Clinton happily signed the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 into law, wiping out Glass-Steagall, which led to the current disastrous collapse of the banking and investment businesses.

And, until Monica Lewinsky disclosed a semen stain on here blue dress, Clinton and secret ally Newt Gingrich were on the verge of "reforming" Social Security and Medicare, i.e. privatization and the setting up of individual investment accounts, much as the Bush II administration proposed eight years later. This is documented in a recently published book, The Pact: Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich, and the Rivalry that Defined a Generation, by History Channel host Steven Gillon.

Even if Barack Obama wins tomorrow's election, the work is far from over. We must drive the elephants-in-donkey suits of the Democratic Leadership Council into the light of day where they can be exposed for what they really are: Rockefeller Republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The sad reality... Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Why isn't Bill Clinton on the list? Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Greed and corruption has brought the country down.
Posted by: Dana L. Stern on Nov 3, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country has been redesigned in the last eight years to server the rich, Washington D.C. elitists, and Wall Street. National security was cast aside by these people in their never ending quest for money and power. McCain will deliver the death blow if elected!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How many more idiots
Posted by: grindermonkey on Nov 3, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
can Texas produce? Jim, we have counted on you to ferret out these lunatics but they still seem to get past the border guards of reason and prudence. I am thinking that this fence on the border of Mexico should be extended all the way around Texas. These men are the poster children for Christian home schooling and Bob Jones MBA's. Faith-based finance doesn't even exist at the used car lot; why should it exist at the US Treasury? Messianic economics has produced in 2008 the Second Coming of 1929. We are all being nailed to the cross.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Re-Establishment Act of the People 2008
Posted by: mwhitley5562 on Nov 3, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This act will restore our Government Back to its Constitutional Republic it was meant to be.
It will remove all of Congress that voted yes on the Bailout, It will bring about an impartial investigation into all Politicians, and remove from public office any who are found to have committed any type of unbecoming behavior for a public servant. It calls for a return of all money taken for any of the bailouts, it will exspand understanding of the Constitution by the common person(Plain and Simple) It will expand content to prevent this kind of action from ever happening again. This act is aimed at all three branches of our Government. This act will shrink Government, and at the same time bring about a element that includes observation over Congress. (position to watch out for the Peoples interest). There is a lot more involved in this act, and if you would like to know more please respond here.

Mike

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But who's going to impliment it? Tell me more! Posted by: common intelligence
The Myth that Laissez Faire Is Responsible for Our Present Crisis
Posted by: alball on Nov 3, 2008 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://mises.org/story/3165

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mis-understanding Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
Democratic Congress Complicit in this Swindle
Posted by: dayahka on Nov 3, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, of course, we have been swindled. Paulson, the man who cooked up those toxic securities, is now bailing out all his rich friends on Wall Street--and doing absolutely nothing for the real economy. The fake economy of the banks and securities firms are still raking it in; the out-of-date car companies are lining up; mortgages are being re-written based on current values, but what happens when house values plunge another 30 percent and your revised mortgage is still more expensive than the value of your house? And who do we appeal to to get us out of this mess, when the Democratic Congress fell over itself to give nearly a trillion dollars to the fake--non-productive--economy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democratic Congress Guilty & Obama Too Posted by: left_libertarian
Same Problem...Different Century
Posted by: robertmc on Nov 3, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is only the latest manifestation of the same problem we have had for 300 years- fractional reserve lending. Until it's done away with, we will continue to suffer at the hands of greedy and foolish slave owners of debtors.
EVERY American should watch this video and ask themselves why this is allowed to continue...this creation of wealth out of nothing more than promises.
Jim, maybe you could do a shorter video in your inimitable style?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STEVEN KING, WHERE ARE YOU NOW.
Posted by: AlteredStates on Nov 3, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 700 billion dollar give-a-way, that Bush/Paulson/Wall Street engineered, was only a "stop gap" meant to prevent an immediate, world wide, melt-down. But, wait until next year,(as they say).
This is what Steven King dreams about. But this time, it's going to be REAL, as in nightmare!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mis-understanding
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on Nov 3, 2008 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Part of the problem in correctly understanding issues is the debasement of language into a tool of manipulation. The result is that it has become increasingly difficult for people to extract true meaning, since the same word or phrase can signify completely different constructs to different people. They may be in agreement, or disagreement, as the case may be, without knowing it.

In Interventionism, An Economic Analysis (1940), Ludwig von Mises wrote:

"The usual terminology of political language is stupid. What is 'left' and what is 'right'? Why should Hitler be 'right' and Stalin, his temporary friend, be 'left'? Who is 'reactionary' and who is 'progressive'? Reaction against an unwise policy is not to be condemned. And progress towards chaos is not to be commended. Nothing should find acceptance just because it is new, radical, and fashionable. 'Orthodoxy' is not an evil if the doctrine on which the 'orthodox' stand is sound. Who is anti-labor, those who want to lower labor to the Russian level, or those who want for labor the capitalistic standard of the United States? Who is 'nationalist,' those who want to bring their nation under the heel of the Nazis, or those who want to preserve its independence?"

We talk about the USA, for example, as “democracy", which is defined as (dictionary.com): government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.

If by "people" we mean persons of average means and intelligence, in reality, the "people" do not govern since their representatives arrive in office pursuant to a process that has been manipulated to favor a moneyed and ownership class minority. Neither is the electoral system "free", unless by free we mean free to be manipulated due to lack of unbiased structure and regulation.

Mr. Hightower says: "government (aka public)", but there is nothing public about it: it consists of the elite and their minions.

Even "capitalism" has lost it's proper meaning (dictionary.com): an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, esp. as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth.

While capitalism exists supra-nationally, there is no capitalism in the USA, because the USA manufactures very little anymore. The "producer" is the factory in China, and its owner may live in the USA, or in the Bahamas; the condition of the average American, or any other wage earner, is irrelevant to him. So the USA is reduced to "producing" intangibles - money out of nothing: debt, to shuffle and slice and dice to make it look like there's an economy. An economy, where somebody actually makes something useful for someone to use, needs consumers, and debt cannot be consumed, only assumed.

Any step in the direction of logically understanding and trouble-shooting what is happening in the world today requires recalibration of our thinking back to the fundamental meanings of the concepts upon which societies and economies are based.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"the government(aka the public)"
Posted by: Knot_Rich on Nov 3, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And where, pray tell, did he get that idea?
As his own article points out time and again, and thank goodness he recognizes that this was not just a republican or democratic problem, "the government" no longer represents "the public" as we define it. The public represented by Washington is the Harvard and Yale Ivy League Elite Club, the people who consider themselves far smarter and better than all the rest of us. The rest of us aren't too proud to say "Huh" when these guys start spouting bullshit, but in those circles questioning for clarity would be like admiting they weren't as smart as the others, so everything goes unchallanged. "The people" haven't been represented in decades, we've become nothing more than a nusance to deal with during election years and cash cows to be milked when they've screwed up and need more money. Many of us wrote all the senators and congressmen we could, even those from other states, telling them to just say "no". The public outcry was torrential, but, in the end, who was represented? The public? Fraid not, once again, without having a choice or any say in the matter we were milked to fund a bail out, our names forged to the loan agreement. And how many of those ?representatives? who voted against the will of their constituents will be held accountable and voted out of office, probably none, because most of the people simply go back to their recliners and rot in front of ESPN, many won't even bother to vote because it's too much trouble to stand in line, and besides, "it doesn't make any difference anyway", and they wonder why we have the ?representatives? we do. Apathy is a politicians best friend.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is the only socialist president in American history.
Posted by: jreal on Nov 3, 2008 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too bad it's for Wall Street. If you think Bush is against socialism your wrong. It's just a matter of which socialism he supports.

Red flags were going up in my head when John Boehner and other K-Street Republicans were pushing and pushing and pushing for this bailout with such a begging manner. These people work for corporations. They are lobbyists with a seat in Washington. Especially Boehner.

Boehner wants corporate rule. He is against any government programs and would rather corporations take care of us. That's how third world countries work. Monopolistic companies supposedly looking out for the people's best interest. Too bad they don't necesarily have to.

If you think Bush is dissapointed about the bail-out, think again. He's getting backroom hi-fives, and whole lot of them. And so is Boehner for bringing home the cookies.

They got the deregulations and they have profited well. They lost their bets but they could count on socialism or a broken country. They knew we couldn't have a broken America.

Looks like Republicans are socialists after all. And they couldn't be happier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Reaganometric Meltdown!!
Posted by: maxsmart on Nov 3, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has been more like 28 yrs as the Reaganometric policy has coursed like cocaine through our country's economic veins!!! free market, best govt is no govt, no regs, deregs, and as Hightower says laissez fairie policy. Our fuddy duddy Pres has been continuously quoted by all these people as their inspiration except but maybe Greenspan gets to trace his genius to Ayn Rand(BFD)!!

Ideology or pure BS it has only proved there was reason for those regs all along!!

Worse still, though is that our business world has been raped by the vulture capitalists in the 80's leaving the Wall Street Wonders nothing to do but invent pyramid schemes. Meanwhile common business practice requires they don't keep any backup funds for fear of buyout vultures who stage hostile takeovers billing themselves as saviors of the stockholders.

Capitalism should be earning the connotation once reserved for liberal and socialist.

Socialism implies social responsibility, something Wall Street sorely lacks, and due to their quarterly earnings ratings now corporate responsibility hardly exists either, look at Exxon-Globilwarming and the EXXON-Valdez settlement or Enron's slight of hand bookkeeping while they were holding the entire state of California hostage.

So it's time to pull back out the social programs, social consciousness, global consciousness, environmental consciousness, socialized medicine, regulation, taxes for necessary government services, turn the switch of government back on and let Phil Gramm and his kind whine their non-functional hearts out

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's the cold reality. CALL BUSH AND TELL THEM NOT TO STEAL THE ELECTION
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
202 456 1111
That's the nightmare. Here's the cold reality.

Swing state Colorado. Before this election, two Republican secretaries of state purged 19.4 percent of the entire voter roll. One in five voters. Pfft!

Swing state New Mexico. One in nine voters in this year's Democratic caucus found their names missing from the state-provided voter registries. And not just any voters. County by county, the number of voters disappeared was in direct proportion to the nonwhite population. Gore won the state by 366 votes; Kerry lost it by only 5,900. Despite reassurances that all has been fixed for Tuesday, Democrats lost from the list in February told me they're still "disappeared" from the lists this week.

Swing state Indiana. In this year's primary, ten nuns were turned away from the polls because of the state's new voter ID law. They had drivers' licenses, but being in their 80s and 90s, they'd let their licenses expire. Cute. But what isn't cute is this: 566,000 registered voters in that state don't have the ID required to vote. Most are racial minorities, the very elderly and first-time voters; that is, Obama voters. Twenty-three other states have new, vote-snatching ID requirements.

Swing state Florida. Despite a lawsuit battle waged by the Brennan Center for Justice, the state's Republican apparatchiks are attempting to block the votes of 85,000 new registrants, forcing them to pass through a new "verification" process. Funny thing: verification applies only to those who signed up in voter drives (mostly black), but not to voters registering at motor vehicle offices (mostly white).



Here's an ugly little secret about American democracy: We don't count all the votes. In 2004, based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.

This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.

That's what I found while traveling the nation over the last year for BBC Television and Rolling Stone Magazine, working with voting rights attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This we guarantee: there will be far more votes disappeared by Tuesday night than the three million lost in 2004. A six-million vote swipe, quite likely, shifts 4 percent of the ballots, within the margin of error of the tightest polls.

Begin with this harsh statistic: since the last election, more than ten million voters have been purged from the nation's vote registries. And that's just the start of the steal.

If the noncount were random, it wouldn't matter. But it's not random. A US Civil Rights Commission analysis shows that the chance a black voter's ballot will "spoil" or be blank is 900 percent higher than a white voter's.

Does that mean the election's stolen and you should forget voting and just go back to bed for four years? Hell, no. It means you vote and vote smart, learn how to pry their filthy little hands off your ballot (there's a link at the end). from Greg Palast and Robert Kennedy Jr

[