Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The bailout's supporters said Congress had to do something to unfreeze the credit markets. It didn't work.

100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why the Bailout Won't Help

By Mark Weisbrot, AlterNet. Posted October 10, 2008.


The bailout's supporters said Congress had to do something to unfreeze the credit markets. It didn't work.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Mark Weisbrot

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

It is now clear the approval by Congress of President Bush's $700 bailout package on Friday October 3rd has done nothing to ease the current financial crisis. Credit markets have worsened for several days after the bill passed the Congress. The stock market also plummeted to nearly ten-year lows.

So much for dire warnings from the Bush Administration that Congress was risking a Great Depression if it did not quickly fork over the dough. The bailout's supporters said Congress had to do something to unfreeze the credit markets. It didn't work.

There is a basic misunderstanding of the current financial crisis and economic recession that is widespread. Most people think that the current economic downturn -- which will be officially designated a recession some time in the near future -- is the result of the financial crisis. But this is not true. The current recession is mainly the result of a collapsing housing bubble. This bubble of more than $8 trillion dollars accumulated between 1996-2006, and it is only about 60 percent deflated so far. This means that even if all the problems in the financial system were miraculously solved tomorrow, the United States would still be facing a serious recession.

Of course the financial crisis can make this worse, as financial institutions cut back on lending and short-term interest rates for commercial borrowing rise. And we are indeed facing a serious financial crisis. But the bailout package is a wasteful and inefficient way of dealing with the problem of banks holding bad debt, mostly related to mortgages gone sour in the housing bust. It enables the U.S. Treasury Department to buy up "troubled assets" -- mostly mortgage-related securities -- from financial institutions, at prices that will likely be much higher than they are worth.

Economists across the political spectrum saw this as a wasteful and inefficient way to fill holes in banks' balance sheets. Ordinary citizens and taxpayers saw the bailout as an enormous rip-off, and flooded Congress with phone calls, defeating the bailout on its first vote.

Indeed, the most important ways that our government is currently holding the financial crisis in check do not involve overpaying banks for bad assets. The Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury have intervened repeatedly to pour liquidity into the banking system. They have agreed to federally insure $3.4 trillion of money market mutual funds held by millions of Americans. This week the Fed created a new facility to buy commercial paper, the short-term debt issued by banks and corporations, where lending has been shrinking. The Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the nation's largest insurer, were also necessary to preserve the stability of the financial system.

All this is just the beginning of cleaning up the mess that has resulted from a de-regulated and un-regulated financial system gone wild. The government will have to take over more insolvent financial institutions and provide capital to others. It will have to take steps to help homeowners, to minimize foreclosures and evictions. And it will need to provide the largest fiscal stimulus package since the Great Depression, to prevent this recession from dragging on for years. The worst part about the bailout is that some politicians will say we can't afford the necessary stimulus because we just added $700 billion to the national debt.

Americans will have to fight for measures that protect the public interest, not the interests of those who made this mess. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson made $163 million as CEO of Goldman Sachs in 2006. Now he and his former colleagues at Goldman are running the Wall Street bailout.

During the Asian financial crisis ten years ago, there was an expression for this kind of system: "crony capitalism."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, recession, bailout

Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director and co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
well...
Posted by: scmp on Oct 10, 2008 4:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe there is a bright side not yet seen. Maybe this crony capitalism will crash for good and the social and economical systems in the US and worldwide will do a hard reset. Maybe finally people will see that an economy based entirely on debt is not sustainable and the concept of "economic growth", especially when based on credit, mimics too well the way a cancer evolves.

The bailout plan doesn't show signs of working. Many are angry, few say "no wonder". We'll see pretty soon how inflation works instead; when that $700bn hit the economy it will become $7 trillion, due to fractional reserve banking system. Nice. In 1923 Weimar Republic issued a 50 million mark banknote worth $1. Maybe we will all become multimillionaires now, even if we will not afford a loaf of bread.

But for a paradigm shift a system must collapse with a big bang, a slow transition just won't do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Oct 10, 2008 10:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing that is very important is to empower the consumer. The consumer has been bankrupted by usury credit and highest prices in history of commodities...in lieu of rising wages. And the tax code must be progressive.

Until these damaging and dangerous problems are fixed, we will remain in the same boat...because without the regular consumer so much of the economy is just not going to run.

We have to reverse the disastrous supply side (which is a total farce anyway) effects by repudiating that, taking money back from overpaid CEOs, etc....whatever it takes.

But this bank rescue is just for the high places as usual...except for the offering of credit (which not one of us should be using except those who run businesses or those who have emergencies)...we are not getting the full effect that we need here because supply side, inequality, dependency upon home prices as a barometer and so on - these concepts that have caused the most damage - have not been fixed. It's just half a package right now....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Financial Bailout: Thanks but No Thanks by Dr. Ellen Brown
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 11, 2008 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Abraham Lincoln was faced with a similar situation when he stepped into the Presidency in 1861. The country was suddenly in a civil war, and there was insufficient money to fund it. The British bankers, knowing they had him over a barrel, agreed to lend him money only at 24 to 36% interest, highly usurious rates that would have bankrupted the North. Our fearless forefather said, “Thanks but no thanks, I’ll print my own.” Issuing the national currency is the sovereign right of governments. A government does not need to borrow its national currency from bankers “merely pretending to have money.” That was the phrase used by Thomas Jefferson when he realized the bankers’ “fractional reserve” lending scheme meant that they were lending the same “reserves” many times over.

The federal dollars issued by Lincoln were called U.S. Notes or Greenbacks. They allowed the North not only to win the Civil War but to create the greatest industrial giant the world had ever seen. Lincoln’s government launched the steel industry, created a continental railroad system, promoted a new era of farm machinery and cheap tools, established free higher education, provided government support to all branches of science, organized the Bureau of Mines, increased labor productivity by 50 to 75 percent. The Greenback was not the only currency used to fund these achievements; but they could not have been accomplished without it, and they could not have been accomplished on money borrowed at 30% interest.

There are other historical examples. In the 1930s, Australia and New Zealand avoided the Depression conditions suffered elsewhere by drawing on a national credit card issued by publicly-owned central banks. The governments of the island states of Guernsey and Jersey have been issuing their own money for two centuries, creating thriving economies without carrying federal debt.

In none of these models has government-issued money created dangerous price inflation. Price inflation results either when the supply of money goes up but the supply of goods doesn’t, or when speculators crash currencies by massive short selling, as in those cases of Latin American hyperinflation when printing-press money was used to pay off foreign debt. When new money is used to produce new goods and services, price inflation does not result because supply and demand rise together. Prices increased during the American Civil War, but this was attributed to the scarcity of goods common in wartime. War produces weapons rather than consumer goods."

Financial Bailout: Thanks but No Thanks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ah, perspectives!!
Posted by: talkville on Oct 22, 2008 2:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is capitalism, the system sustained, supported and maintained by force, by values, and by ideas in virtually our entire society. The question of whether the 'bailout' helped or did not help is simply a reiteration of where each of us stands in the matter. It most certainly did help those human individuals for whom capitalism has always been designed to help from its inception. It did not help those for whom capitalism has always been designed precisely not help, but to exploit, since its inception.

Capitalism will always benefit from few to fewer to fewest. Capitalism will always hinder from more to more to most. We have been blessed (or cursed) with that wish of Confucius to be living in these 'interesting times' of a more expanded and extended capitalist cycle in its downward phase.

Hence the 'crisis'; catastrophe? opportunity? For what? For who?

"The economy" does not float 'out there', dis-embodied and pulsating, like some UFO up in the sky. Each one of us, whether in singularity or together -- whether in this country or another, is the economy and, by the way, is simultaneously also the polis.

What, I wonder, can that other economy be that, in the discourses of our 'experts' all stands beside, outside or somewhere else than "the real economy"?

So, as usual, the social product, the social wealth, is once again injected,this time in the form of Dollars (much more than 700 billion of them!), into the private hands of Bankers (this time, rather than Industrialists in other days past) to use, control and dispense for what is best and most desirable. And, once again the questions: for what? for whom?

"Big wheel keep on turnin'... ."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I GUESS BUSH WAS WRONG...AGAIN
Posted by: AlteredStates on Oct 24, 2008 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is this world coming to? You can't even trust the President anymore. Poor George, he keeps on getting it wrong. You would think, that after all the really wrong, or really, really, wrong pronouncements "W" has made, you would think he would learn from his mistakes. No, it's not going to happen. Why? Simple; Because, he along with his Wall Street buddies (Hank Paulson included) are feckless. Bush, and his kind, repeatedly make outrageous pronouncements to further their cause, only to have to back track and state the obvious; i.e., Alan - the night of the living dead - Greenspan, said he was "shocked" with what was happening on Wall Street. Then, you have Henry (Hank to those of us who really, really, know him) Paulson, with his three page remedy/bailout "newsletter" to buddy Prez. Bush and Congress, that stated this 700 billion rescue package is just what the "Doctor" ordered. For someone who graduated from Harvard Business Law School, you would think that Bush knew this bailout wouldn't work. Alas, it wasn't meant to "work". It was meant to distract, and not solve...anything. This bailout is just buying time. What time? Time enough for the Wall Street crowd, to grab as much money, and run (and don't forget the "Golden Parachute"). Hank Paulson left his 38 million dollar job at Goldman Sachs, to get a job that pays $250,000.00, why? And, don't forget HIS Golden Parachute, of 500 million dollars.

The point I'm trying to make is, it's all bullshit. This time around, they "screwed the pooch"...and they know it. Don't be surprised, that, after Obama wins on November 4th, you find that, "they" knew this financial meltdown was coming. Has anyone stopped to think about the fact, that, the entire world is in the same "boat". Why the feigning surprise the "Rolodex of Experts" show on all these TV network news channels? Well, for one; the news is controlled with repression and suppression. It has gotten to the point, that, you can't tell where the government ends and military industrial complex begins. That's the way it is and it's only going to get worse...much worse!!!

Now "they" are talking about another "Stimulus Package". I'll give them another "Stimulus Package", right here. Guess what it is?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]